请教GWD5-Q30
[size=9.5pt]:GWD5-Q30[/size][size=9.5pt][/size][size=9.5pt]Which of the following most logically completes the argument?[/size][size=9.5pt][/size]
[size=9.5pt][/size]
[size=9.5pt]The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage. However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods. For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain. Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking. However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.[/size][size=9.5pt][/size]
[size=9.5pt][/size]
[size=9.5pt] A. [/size][size=9.5pt]many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelf life[/size][size=9.5pt][/size]
[size=9.5pt] B. [/size][size=9.5pt]it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has[/size][size=9.5pt][/size]
[size=9.5pt] C. [/size][size=9.5pt]cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods[/size][size=9.5pt][/size]
[size=9.5pt] D. [/size][size=9.5pt]certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is [/size][size=9.5pt][/size]
[size=9.5pt] E . [/size][size=9.5pt]for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded [/size]
[size=9.5pt] [font=Helvetica]答案是E 我选的是C[/font][/size]
C错是因为很多事物都吃生的吗
那为什么E对
[[i] 本帖最后由 cici205432 于 2008-8-24 11:45 编辑 [/i]] :GWD5-Q30
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage. However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods. For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain. Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking. However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.
A. many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelf life
B. it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has
C. cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods
D. certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is
E . for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded
答案是E 我选的是C
C错是因为很多事物都吃生的吗
那为什么E对 这里要完成的句子里面说 this fact is either beside the point . . . or else misleading。那么就应该要填和 this fact 有关的。
This fact 指什么？ 还是不懂 我认为这里涉及一个理解的问题
COMPOUNDED 这里的意思是"增加"
所以E的意思说: 无论是irradiated还是cooked,都会减少维B的含量,
也就是说
E并没有解释到"irradiated不比cooked差"
这样讲可以吗? Compounded 在这里不是“增加”而是“加重”，意思就是说两件事合起来的影响超过两件事单独影响的合。
回答这题的关键是 misleading。答案一定要说明为什么 misleading。什么 misleading 呢？从那句可以看到是 this fact。This fact 指什么？指的是 Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking. 那么答案哪个选项是说明 irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking 的呢？A、B、C 都和这个 fact 没有关系。大家再想想为什么 D 错 E 对？
页:
[1]