太傻超级论坛's Archiver

sangoku 发表于 2009-11-20 14:27

关于物理SUB低分要不要送的问题

我的物理SUB的raw score是62分,非常低的一个分数。换算后可能800都不到吧。 vI~ V3^2l
许多人就说,如果把这样的分送过去,会有负面作用。qZ6DZn
我不知道这样的说法是怎么传出来的。没有任何一个官方网站或者招生委员会的人这样说过吧,全是中国的学生自己感觉的。
EJ%Q7z#`U8dO%c!F] 下面是几个TOP50教授,小米给我的回信%T;x h.wL3TJ3c$L6@,R
1.0n.MX5p)G7|[3J t)L
thank you for your interest in our prgoram.  we do require the GRE-subject score as part of your application, so you would X}@;O8GL&~tJ9~;]p
need to send it.  your score is low for chinese students but typical for other countries.  the gre is onlyNAb i4Te'sZ T
one of many factors considered during the application process.
c-~7c,}| 2.$Q'Rw ~\ p~.q6M
Dear Yuchun,S?%KJf+w\!`"U
I would advise you to use the score rather than hiding it.  Not having this score at all could put your application at a disadvantage unless other parts of it can make up for the missing score, such as a high GPA, research experience, publications.  You could also try to retake the test if you have a chance..T/ks3d,q5U0C?
Judy Soine
"A2H'K5@5Qz5G 3.
3Jo(p+G*u#lA2f Dear Yuchun Li, f+|-Y/?,ut#tum`
Each application is considered as a whole and a strength in one area can override a weakness in another.   78% is an acceptable score.   Please send your official score.   It is not a good idea to try and hide the score.
,X [x(zLq2M@3kV Sincerely,~K7{NF!N'bg.S'A
Ms. June Dizer
H`q,KsA MO _8Co
下面是几个网友/师兄师姐的说法9TXd7Q,LxZ,M S!y
1.Ch/KsxG
我77%还准备寄送的"。我感觉只要考了,为什么不寄送呢,至少证明你在专业外语方面还是很好的吧
1O!^/jc)^%~ 我不是个尽善尽美的人,我感觉只要努力进行了。77%就是我的努力,我必须接受自己
A&Ak4}X1IQ 2.&W F x'n Q~
你要不寄,美国佬会认为你没考到700,我一点都不夸张。
!O?,B,Nu3I{W 不要把美国佬当傻子,你真没考?你没考申请啥,你不知道?鬼才信!
m5DZvO&}Q 3.
)R[P}+V+HB2?Q 如果你申物理的, 这分无论如都要寄, 就算考650都要寄. 去查一下就知道, 美国除了Top10中少数几个学校, 被录取者的GRE物理平均分一般就680-800左右. 如果考虑到有一大批990的人, 其实有相当多人GRE物理分很低. 最重要的还是看研究经验. 有个老美GRE物理才5xx分, 但有在很大的研究组做过几年的经验, 一样被Top10录取. 如果你不寄, 基本录取无望.
s J/] @ E/Xvu 4._'\,S&E9R5n2CR)y
以UFL为例,UFL物理排名大概在50左右。我记得他家sub的minimum就是600多,主要原因其实是美国佬的物理sub一般都很烂。但是在美国人眼里,作为中国人sub考个900确实也不值得炫耀,他们也习惯了看到不少sub很高的中国申请者。 Zkco%H%u^%Ep
5.f3g,rP|Pz&W%S
各个学校对sub的看法会有所不同,所以不能一概而论。我只能说LZ你这个分基本上用于申请不会有任何负面影响,只有极少数学校很看重sub成绩,譬如UIUC, 只是一点个人观点。申请要坚定自己的一些想法,能够适当取舍各个地方看到的经验教训,不宜随便听取他人的意见。h Z$rQ [G|
Y V~0g} BJ:]i
(Tm @Li7@ O0n
我的打算是寄。无论是required, recommended,还是压根没有提到SUB。J;Z[3KA H
相信自己的每一个决定,接受自己的污点,承认自己的努力,才是一个真正的qualified man。\)uz@g
祝大家申请顺利

whulj2006 发表于 2009-11-20 20:38

难道楼主的大名是 春哥????

wip727 发表于 2009-11-20 20:53

春哥啊 要膜拜下!

wzyscu 发表于 2009-11-20 20:56

62的分 是肯定能上800的 考了就寄出去吧
fV1Ch,K5d2t/X)Z
st2|wrK 当然春哥不会被这些问题困扰的::11
o!q~9C F 'p,Sny2IPi
[[i] 本帖最后由 wzyscu 于 2009-11-20 22:23 编辑 [/i]]

arthurpandm 发表于 2009-11-20 22:51

看来超级女声的物理水平还是可以,我才考了71。

calmvalianceyy 发表于 2009-11-20 22:56

你不早说你是春哥
#Rcc$~A _r 我要是早认识你也不至于考这么差了::21 ::21

sangoku 发表于 2009-11-21 09:08

再补充一个h.X+o;nq
Dear Yuchun,2Q3u0{ E/M
5}f!DEm'Q,S&j pekY
I do not think the Admissions committee will consider an 800 subject g yO*Q9CZ/rN2YlY
test score to be low. I think it is a very sufficient score. The main e [1G,Mm|1`u
reason they look at that score is to estimate whether a student is
Y)Rb*Cl likely to pass our qualifying exam, once admitted to the program.  All
e-XA @+~%P applicants need to submit their subject test score in order to be
+Iks*[!o,@4V+? considered for admission, so you do need to include it.  Although it may ]h.g[ }a*_*_
be true that many of the applicants from China have higher subject
w9MD"]6[b+Ku$? score, your score is very much in the acceptable range of all
`Y_XG applicants. The committee will be looking more at your letters of 7L.C)RF\Jh iU6B
recommendation, research experience, and TOEFL (especially speaking)
*W&OK{lL_){ scores.T hey will want to know (from your transcript) that you have a #@B!YG JRS
sufficient physics course base as well.
Xg(IdjPE :qz1jQs:@5x1}
Best regards during the application process.
1D$S} j2M.d E~ h f1V P'bo?JL
Jane

JJwendy 发表于 2009-11-27 09:38

::z1  谢谢

lincoln_8513 发表于 2009-11-28 06:20

2和4都是我说的原话,大概是一年或者两三年前说的,LZ你能挖出来真不容易。。

davidibt 发表于 2009-12-2 20:38

其实美国的学生考的也不错,因为他们有的考好几次,看看他们的论坛吧 [url]http://www.physicsgre.com/[/url]

kc312 发表于 2009-12-4 00:36

谢谢lz!

页: [1]

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 6.1.0  © 2001-2007 Comsenz Inc.