发新话题
打印

[考场传真] 本人写的一篇issue, 恳请网友指教。(批得越残越好啊)

本人写的一篇issue, 恳请网友指教。(批得越残越好啊)

TOPIC: ISSUE10 - "Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive, because it is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated."
( ^  a* A  ?& S3 BWORDS: 610          TIME: 1:00:00          DATE: 2008/7/15
. A" Z, T7 @' d& E  |0 R  d. w
The speaker claims that the thrive of the major cities is the most important,because (on the assumption that )a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated primarily in cities.To ensure it ,the governments must ensure their  major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive. But in common sense ,not every country in all its periods preserve and generate its cultural traditions mainly in cities.What's more ,what the governments must do for the major cities is not under all situations ,and how the governments should devote the finance must accords with many different kinds of aspects .To show the contention directly as above is partial and need more analyse.# Y9 b6 J+ V+ m7 Y2 _
) \  {; Z: G) E( I; N0 ]" |2 m- k
Of course ,to ensure the major cities receive plenty enough finance support in order to thrive is the governments main task,for the major cities can make more jobs and production so that it can ,to some certain extent ,help the whole people to live a better life.More over ,once the major cities thrive ,to some extent ,like Shanghai and Beingjing in China ,and Newyork and Los Angelos in the U.S,they will raise the reputation of the whole country ,which will bring the confidence and belief by citizens to the government and will promote it to work better,like a reward to a part-race winner.However ,when there's more important  events need money and the finance is sufficient,the idea that "the major cities first" might be a wrong choice sometimes.For example, at the begining of the development in the west of the U.S, the finance should be most devoted to the small and less developed cities in the west ,rather than the big ones in the east.This method ,in the end ,turn out to be profoundly successful.( I2 b8 e( e6 h% S, x7 s( \

% `, Z, A: V: Q$ d0 VAnother main problem is the contention that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated  primarily in cities have no evidence and seems somehow rediculous .A simple exception can be that even nowadays ,there still many undeveloped countries have no cities actually, so ,surely,which cultural traditions all exist in the countryside.But in fact, to most countries ,their main cultural traditions preserved and generated in major cities ,so that the statement  is not absolutely wrong." P% J, o0 y; ]& S

3 W3 z" B' R, U5 [7 b& F% mWhat was worse is that the two sentences written by the author above ,I considered, maybe cannot form a causal relationship.First,we can just assume the  statement is true, that is to say ,the nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated in cities. Then how could we know if we only develop a few cities which we considered more important than others ,all the cities as a whole will benefit most ,the whole country will benefit most.What's more ,we all know as a kind of common sense and everyday experience as human beings,the culture is the sole of one people and a nation,but to make effort to ensure the major cities to thrive is not only to preserve and generate the culture,what counts most is to promote the whole country's ecnomic via the development of the major cities.All other things ,such as a nation's culture , powerful affectiveness ,depend on whether the nation owns an  powerful ecnomic.
7 G/ C4 e3 _: @0 N; s$ {+ L1 D& L% {$ n- M( E6 y3 w
In sum, the governments surely have the responsability to promote its major cities to thrive by ensuring that they are able to receive the financial support they need, but the governments also need to consider the whole country's interest and  use the limited finance more efficiency in order to make most of the people ,no matter living in the countryside or in the downtown,benefit most.Though most countries in twenty-first century preserved and genereated its nation's cultural traditions in cities ,there  still lots of exception.So the contention is partial.And it is illogical to the former sentence.

TOP

To show the contention directly as above is partial and need more analyse.半句?6 w( k5 V: E( Z) _4 w, {' ?
issue 感觉被你写argument 了, 没有你自己的观点

TOP

具体一点啊。

我没懂。

TOP

不好意思,回复晚了 ,写成驳论文不是不可以,但你写的很象argument,ets有规定issue写成argument是不符合要求的,两个考察的重点不一样,所以强烈建议ls换一种论证结构,至于语言和语法没细看,感觉没有结构和说理重要,自己托福经验告诉我光有复杂的句子和用词没用,你的reasoning最重要

TOP

发新话题