发新话题
打印

Argument 199

Argument 199

哪位有提纲???  帮忙分析一下 谢啦~~0 I1 M/ e/ P0 u" F9 D3 Y
感觉能写的内容很少
/ {0 `, b5 l- H6 \4 g
# P7 W4 I) ], t/ o' E: a3 WThere is a general idea that waiters and waitresses are more likely to receive larger gratuities from large groups of people. A recent research study suggests this is not true. The researchers examined the relationship between the size of tips in restaurants and the number of meals charged on the bill. They found that, while most tips were around 15 percent, the minimum percentage considered appropriate, people dining alone tipped consistently more (19 percent) and those dining in groups of four or more tipped considerably less (13 percent) than this 15 percent standard. These results strongly suggest that people dining in a group are less likely to feel personally responsible for leaving an adequate or generous tip.

TOP

同求啊 !~!!!!!!

TOP

搜一下吧,好多都有的
每到考试前几天,总会有一个感觉,如果再多给几天,肯定能考的更好,但是时间很充裕的时候,又会怎么想呢

TOP

我的看法:. b2 ^* V8 L- j5 q

7 `* D; [2 A) r0 o2 t5 r: p+ E1. survey里没有指明地点,样本数量,具体的时间,the reliability of the survey is open to doubt.
2 z+ C9 S% A: q# E1 E( T, h2. 即使 survey 的结果是可参照的,但对于群体就餐的人数没有明确的定义,如果两个,三个人也算群体就餐,这种情况下的数据没有给明。也许两个,三个人的情况下,给的小费反而多呢?" R6 N. ]( O" \" I$ t8 W
3. 即使以上的假定都成立,也不能表明就餐者feel less personally responsible.
经过,路过,伊人不可错过...

TOP

发新话题