ARGUMENT写作经典句型总结
ARGUMENT写作经典句型总结::)::)
! N- O7 G& \( W' Z以下都是我24号，也就是考前2天，花了4个小时，熬夜到2点半总结出来的～
. r( E4 C& [( A! ]' o, k) f5 l来源包括：猴哥写作满分教程，寒假新东方GRE班笔记，新东方发的蓝皮的GRE写作教程后面的PETERSON的范文～) k! C- t: \# s7 d* j
, z# k; ~1 F, e) i; d: U我把所有句型按照自己的理解分成了13种，由于时间很紧，难免有不合理的地方，望大家谅解～～ ：）4 p' H1 q3 [! B3 C. K* W
3 t+ c, L, |, G6 L
我写ARGUMENT所用的所有句型都是从这个东西里挑出来的～
7 E V' {. A ^; |( ^! e r3 Q% I* y其实我觉得最好还是自己总结比较好，印象比较深一些～
( x5 M4 G: c7 b# f9 j$ Y
9 u- V) b! Q/ e+ o因为用别人的句子其实是————每个人都按自己的理性的行为结果是集体的非理性～呵呵～
0 `$ T9 Q1 r+ c% w* ^) y3 ]/ q
& w) c- t K$ X L% K; { Z容易出现拼写错误的词:Assumption, available, guarantee, account, possibility, moreover,
. R% I. q, ^ E/ z1 v- v3 @& P) O4 M4 V7 R; F
承接Therefore/thus/hence/so/consequently/clearly/moreover/besides
3 H" w4 m) S- s Y引导结论conclude/claim/assert/propose
; g4 h; U" S/ f3 F' C+ x" ^显示,表明show/imply/prove/indicate/illustrate/demonstrate
7 M# f6 L' s, ?/ ~建议 recommend/suggest/advise 倡议 advocate
" W* s3 C; c" ?* L$ U/ `预言,预计predict/project/forecast/expect1 A: z* L- ?. }6 j" b% @4 m5 l1 \
9 |6 A) p8 U: L( W/ A
首段开头句型:
2 s8 E3 P& v. x W& Y5 z& X6 P8 h1) In this editorial/argument, the author argues that __.The author also claim that __.To support these claims the author points out that __. The author also points out that __.4 m7 B1 I, r) s2 R' U
4 r. X2 C. O7 l( o
2) This editorial/memo recommends that __.To support this recommendation, the author points out that __.the author also points out that __ ,and that __.Finally, the manager cites that __.
2 m3 a I& }; g7 L! h3 p% p1 @6 {: `5 Z8 a, n- {
首段结尾句型:
4 N) i: @- V$ `# X# W9 V+ p, e" }& p% V3 o5 {$ C) T. r* M' p
3) I find the editorial/argument logically unconvincing in several respects. /I find this argument specious on several grounds.
* g! a1 T: }$ \ o* M4 t) C7 J. H2 k/ b
4) However, the argument relies on a series of unsubstantiated assumptions, which render it unconvincing as it stands. /However, the argument/editorial relies on a number of doubtful assumptions and is therefore unconvincing.
9 ^) R& P4 C3 J+ B% ~
9 }0 d0 |( ^" M5 ^( u5) This argument depends on several unsubstantiated assumptions and is therefore unpersuasive as it stands.6 _8 T. ?6 F' i! }, R: S$ M+ [
; W/ |$ y$ w+ F6) This argument is problematic /flawed in several critical respects.
" c) _, w$ k: M1 U5 b! ?2 { q& [+ l; F4 A; j2 l; |
7) A careful analysis of the study reveals several problems with the editorial’s argument.
. i1 e- Z6 \4 p. N7 f! |& Y* F0 |0 a3 z" o$ N0 J2 Y& G6 W9 i
8) The study suffers from certain statistical and other problems, which render the conclusion based upon it unpersuasive.
( m* B6 w% w1 z. `! s& u
' L9 }) f. i6 ?/ [9) As discussed below, the argument suffers from several critical flaws and is therefore unpersuasive as it stands.. O4 E$ z# G" Q+ p; I; [# b
C8 q6 L5 L& D2 V1 ]3 p O
10) However, careful scrutiny of the evidence reveals that it accomplishes little toward supporting the director’s claim, as discussed below.
h- p$ H9 H8 b# Y0 P# v$ Y
) r; E4 j/ x. _$ t7 F11) However, close scrutiny of the manager’s argument reveals several unproven assumptions, which render it unconvincing./ R! R9 E( I$ E
/ [/ n: j$ W; u12) The argument suffers from several logical flaws and is therefore unconvincing as it stands.1 J7 Z$ i( k' T) O' B
2 L+ ^9 D& M$ L$ ^$ I0 Y13) As discussed below, the argument suffers from several critical flaws and is therefore unpersuasive.8 n, p* u: s" S
1 Z0 F+ T6 e/ p2 p7 x
调查,统计的准确性:
; {$ l' p7 k; h& C& k14) Many ___ were actually excluded from the survey." s9 t$ f0 i& w1 K5 O5 W
9 J: V G4 y) f) L/ V; h15) The result of the survey lacks validity/credibility/reliability and therefore could not lend strong support to the arguer’s claim/propose.' G- \% f& T3 F
, J( N! R5 y: J! C" m7 a16) The result of the survey lacks validity/credibility because/as the sample is too limited.
( r" n" J& {7 I+ I8 M/ |0 h0 y3 `4 G: o. N
17) The survey does not provide complete information concerning the effect ___' Q- s! L, s; E2 B
4 f8 k6 ?, t$ g* P8 m: p0 X, S18) The number reported ___ does not necessarily reflect the number actually ___ R; W# q6 @* m# e) n7 s3 e% a( Z- P
3 ~- U( T( R, }. E" w% o; C) O
19) The statistics comparing __ might be distorted in one or more respects
: W8 s! o$ y n& i7 R) ?& f. i, R0 E2 f) E- w& e4 d. P' g
20) These statistics were based only on data from __.
4 \, U0 `! v0 k; q/ J+ A1 ~: j" h- W, s2 G B( V7 n( e" ~, Q
21) The cited statistics about __ might be unreliable in other respects as well.
# Y) I( Y" B* o7 O" r
7 m" H5 J8 v6 Q6 j* {: b22) It is unfair to conclude from one survey suggesting that __
9 ]. q, C6 c) i% H) H
/ r9 f8 s- c0 s1 s& D23) Moreover, a single survey taken just prior to __ is sustainable.
& e4 n7 \/ N* v+ T% E. @4 x4 i1 X3 J( S. I5 y/ j
24) Although the number of __ is relatively high, the per __(capita) number might be relatively low.
& r# q& Q" w/ e$ D4 X' X$ h; p9 d. C
A与B之间的关系(主要是因果关系):
* h, y* b. n! s1 M. o, l4 p25) A bears some relation to B./(Establish) a casual relationship between A and B
. _, k! G8 B9 n. Y! D* H% J- @9 Q/ i7 C2 S$ Y
26) No evidence was given to substantiate the claim that A contribute to B! X& e/ g8 x8 r/ M2 }: }9 J% M
$ }0 y0 O/ n8 Z& l4 h, l
27) The fact that A does not necessarily follow that B# }3 w3 l& p3 p9 p( h, i+ t3 b3 P& p
: D" N( n* V* n+ M# b28) The mere fact that A proves nothing about B.
+ k5 S" x! o5 }+ w7 ]
- Z. W7 e. |2 t5 g29) The inference rests on the assumption (A) that B is unconvincing./ w* X7 S6 f& `# Y' n
, S/ @' u. {7 V/ u; p
A与B 的进行比较(类比,类推)的问题:8 O. {4 A5 E- m* ~' ?
30) Are the two towns/companies comparable at every aspect?
& s9 O9 e7 [+ Z1 ]- c w5 {) a: J( m/ G7 V5 U; b
31) The comparison between A and B is incomplete, hence/consequently we can hardly evaluate that ___
3 o& L% i% |( K8 W' S7 I- \' J& ^9 M3 S. ~- V, K2 W. l8 h/ a0 E: ]9 l( X
32) The argument is unconvincing because it is based on a false analogy.
@! X% H! v7 q1 `6 ^, T! V
9 p P+ ~" x- f33) Without showing that all other conditions in the two areas have been essentially the same, the author cannot convince me that __
' v! z+ G5 M y5 ^
~, K: K _1 J2 Q5 R7 L; t5 b' w( K作者忽视其他原因的问题:
6 s( T: d# p+ S1 L! ?8 L$ R+ T34) The arguer ignores other possible factors that may also leads/contribute to_. Perhaps _ Or perhaps __ More over, perhaps __
4 S F0 @# V" K* i J ]! ]0 g1 k" ~
35) There is a good chance that ___/It is entirely/highly possible that___: F- x, t' I+ h; l" ?
# n8 e* }" w1 L
36) The arguer fails to take into account / rule out the possibility
! z4 y; ?* j- B) D, X) uthat ___, thus/hence/therefore we can not evaluate the overall effect of ___' z+ F5 t( H5 B
1 J6 [ O9 {3 n O4 R# }" X3 [37) The author overlooks the possibility that (only a small portion of )__
! V- S* T: L& M* k. c
" H. J$ i5 k' a3 g5 J( J1 S2 i38) The author also ignores the possibility that __( k1 F# Q9 U) {2 W |) C- L! [
% u' d" F/ V, @7 z" U- X作者偷换概念,错误等同的问题:3 y4 ?* }+ z) R! X% U/ Q9 V1 D
39) The arguer does not differentiate between ___ and ___
: s$ |( }1 {6 e% l, j, w* ]* }: |) Y& k" H$ p- b9 F5 i3 C
作者提供信息不完全,或所给论据不支持论点的问题:
" t1 z9 h- K5 H, N" z40) The arguer does not provide/offer any information concerning the ___./No information concerning ___ is provided.
9 O2 ?" S3 t/ [( G) P5 q6 ?8 _& a' n- j; ^' }! y& r
41) However, this evidence provides little credible support for the argument’s/editorial’s conclusion/assertion.$ C& B. _+ u1 c4 \
6 W' Q3 b2 ^2 `, w( r7 L( R+ P* D9 O
42) The evidence involving __ does not adequately show that __7 l9 T- {& Z) `9 |0 w, Z4 N8 }. q
0 t Y" m0 f0 t% W k: n43) A reduction/increase in the A rate does not necessarily indicate a reduction/increase in overall A rate.
( v& `1 G5 L! K/ l8 e( K9 J1 \9 o/ ~) H/ k0 e# R0 K- j
44) For the majority of __ it is probably more important to __.Thus, I cannot accept the author’s sweeping recommendation for all __
7 a; u7 k5 c5 _- N4 E8 X8 i2 j! ]! Z: b8 \# v# H
作者假设前提谬误问题:0 N: Z- [1 ^: B
45) The assumption that ___ is unfounded/unwarranted/suspicious/unreliable/unconvincing/groundless/suspect able. ^, |+ T% J2 q, z) M0 [
0 C- o/ ~2 s) b: ?6 @5 ^) n46) No evidence could indicate that ___
1 m% Z2 I8 [) N5 m: l; V6 }
* x" `& k4 B/ r1 Q. B47) The author unfairly/fallaciously/falsely assumes that ___
9 g$ b6 v- E4 `* {! s4 X7 Q W1 Z' l$ p
7 P3 _( f% u* C2 b48) The number of ___(physicians) does not necessarily indicate the quality of ___(health care)/leads to the result that___.
( e( Z- ~8 @- k& m; j: K0 k3 L0 X3 I5 g8 |
49) Credibility of the evidence and feasibility of the conclusion is open to doubt
3 u5 M" a3 s7 J# h" b
( g3 e5 I+ d( E50) The author’s assumption that __ is unsupported.
% F/ U Q9 Y1 d
3 U) b i9 G; \0 W# q作让步假设,推出谬误类句型:
; E0 v: s* n, s x/ l& x1 X51) Granted that A /even is A is true, there is no guarantee that/it does not necessarily follow that ___. /Even though, it is true that __2 H6 w1 j9 T4 T B- a
% g( U* X: J j4 b: m52) Even if A was responsible for B, the editorial’s claim that __ is unwarranted.; {+ v- S/ U+ O# ?; \1 W T
+ _0 x. w G8 M53) Even assuming __, the author unfairly infers that __
7 ? p0 C% J: ] t# I6 m# X7 L9 G3 @7 k: r
其他论述段结尾句:
9 n( B/ \# p$ N4 d' X* u `54) In short, without ruling out other possible explanations for the difference between __/(scenarios), the author cannot safely/reasonably conclude that/(reasonably rely on these statistics to support the claim that) __. P/ R7 {, i7 P
1 F) L- } J. s0 R5 D3 d
55) In short, without evidence that all other conditions that might affect __, the author’s claim that __ is dubious at best.
/ a; s& f( m: D
. U% A( W7 i+ g- X! [7 d! q) B7 J总结,结论用语:: }+ {' @& v6 n7 ^8 o+ [5 W
56) In the absence of/Lacking data concerning that total amount of ___, the credibility of the result of the survey is skeptical /unfounded/groundless/open to doubt.9 C- ^& V8 n: ?6 _6 M
4 ]$ i/ S" O$ w; ?; X
57) Unless the arguer can provide substantial/valid/solid/concrete evidence concerning ___, the conclusion can not be properly/safely drawn,
1 P- ~8 h$ h& ^- ?& R* _1 _3 i. y# b6 J, a) y8 n6 M
58) In sum, the author’s evidence accomplishes little toward supporting the author’s argument for __. \# U5 e* ^# g
% {; _0 o: p+ W5 C3 X2 g- S; |59) To evaluate the conclusion more efficiently/to make the conclusion more convincing/to justify this claim, the author must provide supporting evidence.
5 P6 N. }* K" ^
5 `2 Y" `. A0 |7 l. s7 G% g+ q60) In short, without evidence that all other conditions that might affect ___, the author’s claim that ___ is dubious at best.
& Y, S9 H1 s3 s( r9 f" i1 e/ s: `* s3 D
61) In sum, the editorial relies on a series of dubious assumptions, which render it wholly unpersuasive.
3 w% O7 R6 _) O
- n* C/ B! m a9 u62) To strengthen it(the argument) the author must show that __, and that __( q1 s+ t3 V0 D# i" E
6 {/ p* H% }2 T: n* }, V
63) To (further) bolster the editorial’s claims the author must provide clear evidence that reason A , and not some other phenomenon, was in fact responsible for (a increase/decline in __) + L: n- K. m9 {. d7 u
6 g+ Y$ i0 \5 N& b9 L6 M# _其他有用句型:
n3 B7 I2 q6 f, M( @64) Yet common sense informs me that ___
1 a$ ?0 H1 n6 F6 z3 {9 D. m/ w( A% P2 j' L2 e3 l h5 M
65) The base amount of donations/the increase is not available.
* {" H; E$ v; |0 V y( e5 V4 E$ I8 C( b& y8 V
66) A is a good indication of B
6 Y+ L O8 `9 Q# ] ~4 H' o& e7 y1 p) b4 R/ X( O, ^" _
67) To support these claims the author points out that ___
$ a% R, P* a) N- p6 m' u& N" I3 h6 v: Z( D' W$ F$ r0 x
68) 1. The major/main flaw/problem with the argument is that ___. 2. Another flaw that weakens the logic of the argument is that ___. 3.Before I come to my conclusion, it is necessary to point out that ___
# D* x& ?8 Q* ^# l
- q2 B8 i2 q' F8 w$ U" _( @. ~& p) p69) 1. To begin with, the author has failed to convince me that __
$ c2 K* u: `! u( Z0 {3 Q& A# [! r# T3 S' |& q& R4 m9 ]
2. Moreover 3. Even if 4. Even assuming __
