America's Best Graduate Schools-2007(最新版本）－工程院
Massachusetts Institute of Technology . w+ F% Q* b9 B0 P$ X O
1 100 4.9 4.8 775 25.4% 4.4 13.2% $224.8 $622.7 273 2,717 * k5 [8 b6 i- r1 X2 N
, Z! p( I* J, m7 y
Stanford University (CA) 1 o8 D C/ Z+ k! l3 W' v
2 95 4.9 4.6 778 35.8% 5.1 14.8% $142.7 $689.3 260 3,218 & \2 `2 M$ O1 T0 Q0 P
5 i7 O) U) T, u; E; y- lUniversity of California–Berkeley ! |1 q1 Y o+ `* l- e2 W
3 86 4.8 4.6 773 17.5% 4.5 21.0% $118.0 $477.8 201 1,694 5 b: Z3 O/ D/ C% c5 M. q9 {
$ S% o+ G% D% T3 V. Z0 }1 IGeorgia Institute of Technology 5 F8 [. Z$ h' o' e u4 X/ A2 M
4 85 4.5 4.3 760 33.8% 4.1 5.0% $202.2 $426.6 275 3,685
- h& e! R T. k% [8 K$ @& C1 ?- C- m- R6 ^
University of Illinois–Urbana-Champaign 5 K% U. K S# j
5 82 4.5 4.3 773 19.9% 4.1 2.2% $195.8 $473.0 220 2,507
" m4 X& E! ]% A7 G4 X. i/ [9 V9 f% o
Purdue University–West Lafayette (IN) 4 {8 ^5 L# a( W3 w. k8 Y
6 80 4.2 4.1 751 36.5% 4.0 5.1% $211.6 $676.0 183 2,273 / p7 x. m; }5 V% [& w4 T
; G% Y* G0 {# v7 F2 w4 G5 l3 L" y
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
! I2 l' V, I2 x& I6 80 4.5 4.1 770 42.3% 4.4 4.0% $157.4 $507.6 226 2,390
9 e8 g" O1 i2 J6 X
) f* M. _/ i, a p4 w" QCarnegie Mellon University (PA) . ^, C ?3 {( R4 D' O0 |
8 78 4.3 4.3 772 24.8% 4.4 8.6% $142.3 $711.7 136 1,570
1 n) p) t, `- J- v, X4 j/ }, e5 I4 i, \% g, w& V+ w
University of Southern California (Viterbi) \. c: F9 m1 L1 s3 m) ?! F
9 76 3.7 3.6 749 48.5% 5.7 14.1% $157.4 $965.4 91 3,560 ; m" H. Q% i; c% Y3 d1 s
) o: E, ?% h* o$ M' ~California Institute of Technology
9 e: M+ _! |( g10 75 4.7 4.6 790 10.9% 5.3 10.1% $51.2 $538.5 74 577 # x& d0 t/ Y, T! K5 i8 K7 ^$ E" C
4 W5 ^" |9 w g; R
Cornell University (NY) 4 k9 z1 K' h: H
11 73 4.3 4.3 760 22.4% 4.2 8.7% $112.2 $544.8 116 1,234 9 z- w& m3 u" e( ]2 [9 a
' v" U' v* p: M+ k6 u, A/ F/ r
University of California–San Diego (Jacobs)
$ J5 E3 G9 w# V/ u11 73 3.8 3.9 764 21.8% 4.9 11.0% $128.8 $805.2 68 1,147
: |0 Z" U% F2 F$ @/ t
7 |/ O- Y" h$ jUniversity of Texas–Austin ! \" ^+ W) v- s4 P
13 69 4.2 4.1 760 28.6% 3.7 8.8% $106.9 $464.6 143 2,059 ! I# L, C: n. D# ~4 V
8 `- r- o3 y* X6 S/ gTexas A&M University–College Station (Look)
; _; m9 j- I8 X u. ~" a$ b14 68 3.7 3.7 740 44.4% 3.0 3.5% $179.0 $675.4 148 2,187
+ _* ?5 g1 f; z2 \
0 V9 }3 h7 U. {0 Y* c2 iUniversity of California–Los Angeles (Samueli)
5 `, x# e' [# }15 66 3.7 3.8 766 34.6% 5.2 11.4% $88.3 $605.1 137 1,256
7 m- ]+ l6 w$ ^ x- i. x2 X6 O' Q5 w. Z
University of Maryland–College Park (Clark) & X% R, p7 H1 g2 c( {. O
15 66 3.6 3.7 760 24.0% 4.5 5.3% $145.3 $637.1 149 1,943
4 E7 g# }- w# O9 C/ F4 t/ |( p9 i" k3 H# H& t1 ]8 x
University of Wisconsin–Madison
( v+ m2 t+ Q: l& J15 66 4.1 3.8 779 21.2% 3.4 4.5% $123.2 $528.9 72 1,517 + l7 _/ k: r: ]8 ?% z0 r3 H
$ G3 @. s' H& l: A) M& M
Princeton University (NJ)
6 N0 `1 m, \) G18 63 4.1 4.2 782 17.0% 3.3 12.6% $54.7 $437.9 72 449
) y2 g8 c$ d" [
" R! e; u) n, r4 M* rPennsylvania State University–University Park
2 |1 B* r& e0 V8 ~ p& d d19 60 3.9 3.8 752 34.1% 2.8 2.8% $121.0 $387.9 150 1,549
5 c; j, }. R1 @. S; H$ P+ V- N+ F6 o1 W4 m9 T& |2 V, y9 ~
Columbia University (Fu Foundation) (NY)
# [" G8 f- \2 Y$ ?20 58 3.6 3.8 767 37.8% 3.8 9.0% $75.0 $563.8 58 1,220
: c* a" r. C# z) _2 p+ q( ~ H1 D$ d2 X0 P6 }: a7 k
Harvard University (MA)
K3 j" q9 t$ P3 }21 57 3.6 3.9 772 12.8% 4.5 13.6% $33.2 $581.6 20 302 3 h/ }8 F4 b: @4 q4 i) l
& l. [3 A( e7 FJohns Hopkins University (Whiting) (MD)
& J' B0 q( {4 [" ?% X21 57 4.0 3.9 767 18.4% 3.9 1.5% $53.2 $385.4 71 2,723 6 h4 u2 u$ {% V0 m' [
8 H9 T2 E$ m# j) ]$ a& ?
Northwestern University (McCormick) (IL)
' U2 G! _4 x+ V0 v' ~( |# q. _21 57 3.9 3.8 751 25.1% 3.8 5.1% $78.2 $446.7 83 1,195 $ Z( z& s" V5 v. G+ u( ^, m# y1 b, K$ R* c
1 T6 Q9 `' @: l. u5 e' l( t% _
University of California–Santa Barbara
% i& Q0 }. e; M' Q; v& ^4 n21 57 3.5 3.5 762 20.8% 4.4 16.5% $69.1 $544.3 78 694 ) Y6 F' T V! a1 B" m; S
* [( h( ]- f7 z" |- ~& k) v$ Q
University of Washington
2 t8 x$ q! z; t8 }4 T8 `8 [21 57 3.7 3.7 733 34.5% 4.2 5.3% $91.8 $482.9 95 1,451 2 E% g! J5 u4 V4 M, E/ f$ @
l% G$ T v# R3 I" R3 o0 P
Ohio State University
5 c/ x- `7 I& v% P9 G5 N2 e26 55 3.6 3.5 762 25.4% 2.8 2.4% $106.8 $420.6 96 1,235
( F' i& \9 T8 v% W1 S! _/ @ I" O# Z6 p# _# T6 E: U* I2 p
University of Florida
& X6 D- G( ~# W: V6 j. D26 55 3.5 3.7 752 53.6% 4.2 1.8% $92.1 $341.1 145 2,041
! q, K, `# P; q" O; L
9 L0 n# m9 A' {9 t. M9 N. H. ]University of Minnesota–Twin Cities
' K, h& X" f/ z. i* ^ H28 54 3.8 3.7 761 40.3% 3.8 5.9% $63.1 $280.4 115 1,631
( S8 \1 I/ u, i# ~
8 Q" Q& N* ~* G1 }% ^, \6 A. NRice University (Brown) (TX)
% B+ ~4 s5 T& M0 K. C$ i2 ]. i% p29 53 3.7 3.8 757 21.7% 4.8 7.8% $33.1 $337.3 65 548 # O/ I7 `1 c" y# a9 q: ~. d
1 y7 ]+ ^4 q6 Y' M9 `3 yDuke University (NC)
9 l$ J7 D/ Q% N$ Q30 52 3.6 3.8 760 26.6% 3.6 1.8% $55.4 $522.4 47 514 + f8 j4 l1 d% z1 i+ `5 }/ w" v" q. R
: J- S& c& Y+ ]) }4 a" p6 v& x8 q
Virginia Tech
$ R+ ?8 b2 @' U& ]' @1 B: s2 ]30 52 3.7 3.8 770 26.7% 2.6 2.1% $56.1 $183.4 113 1,817
3 [) M" I7 X. c! E7 j/ f* D- L
0 L9 S- U% X" |! |5 S0 sUniversity of Pennsylvania , Y- u. S+ p; ?! j
32 51 3.5 3.6 757 31.4% 4.2 6.1% $47.1 $457.1 41 1,036 - S/ |& `, B0 j% n0 `2 L8 I
% A; \/ J* d! D; wNorth Carolina State University % H1 e V2 @$ l: a$ B: q
33 50 3.4 3.4 751 25.7% 3.0 3.8% $93.0 $330.8 97 1,795
, X9 Q9 Q; j8 k* k, C0 _0 c! d
- i) D4 [6 x$ SWashington University in St. Louis (Sever) + t( f2 H/ V' z# V
33 50 3.3 3.6 760 32.5% 3.2 6.8% $53.3 $605.2 33 862 & e, j/ f; D: o* I! L# T& T
; X R+ F9 A- SUniversity of California–Davis / v6 v' x$ F) v" R1 [- D
35 49 3.4 3.5 756 31.5% 4.1 5.6% $60.0 $340.9 72 1,116 6 M! v8 Q1 a( t5 d
' i- B! p1 U; n
University of Rochester (NY) ) C L8 E( i& L- ^- r: ]. N
35 49 2.7 3.0 763 15.7% 3.4 1.2% $99.1 $1,208.9 42 368
2 y: G: R+ B8 o3 p9 Y, q8 ~0 g) W0 {$ G; y
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (NY)
) F$ t. a: W7 k: | @7 H9 N37 48 3.6 3.8 754 31.5% 3.0 5.5% $41.7 $249.5 82 1,083 $ y- s `6 M2 q8 r
, |2 r& E7 b( B) IUniversity of Virginia & e- `8 U3 T/ x- f* G2 q& S! s
38 47 3.4 3.4 741 20.5% 3.3 6.8% $50.6 $383.4 55 767 ) L4 Q( n0 c' x) [1 q
+ W; ~' W* \% U0 a+ ?/ \
University of Colorado–Boulder
0 A9 T1 s4 V5 b r39 46 3.4 3.4 745 63.5% 3.0 4.8% $57.6 $364.6 69 1,461
( m: @& S' n( S6 e2 _0 X0 x# ?/ v0 r/ p! _# S
Yale University (CT)
9 d- L) Q& D8 g# `39 46 3.3 3.8 769 13.6% 2.8 8.2% $24.4 $321.4 22 222 ( N4 |! w9 s8 j# M! P
- W r- K2 r4 u7 T) ?4 Q
University of California–Irvine (Samueli) 0 q! K3 S: G; W. N
41 44 3.2 3.4 751 24.1% 4.5 5.3% $44.5 $315.9 45 965 - R0 v* R4 G' t! w' N; }
/ Z" S7 G x% f8 }6 KBoston University
& j" P& X6 ?3 `7 l: J42 43 2.9 3.2 767 26.7% 3.9 3.4% $51.4 $472.0 56 682
+ C; I; G/ V: o- f/ B- D9 K d4 d0 m4 b, T# s) l$ h
Case Western Reserve University (OH)
! @2 f! I+ Y8 X1 A8 L! a7 f42 43 3.3 3.4 758 28.0% 2.4 2.6% $40.6 $369.2 65 634
9 J& e" Q7 D; z5 `% ~- `5 f1 z
1 k# C( z# f8 Y0 b( R {/ S+ cDartmouth College (Thayer) (NH) " M" y# l5 h# Q" Q1 R
42 43 3.1 3.5 767 14.7% 2.3 2.4% $19.2 $493.0 22 186
- U0 S0 [* ~2 V/ j. h# x
8 s) N+ w) ^1 _4 ]. f. k" Q( dIowa State University
# k6 d d9 N* S$ q1 C! B42 43 3.3 3.6 742 18.7% 2.3 1.0% $58.6 $277.6 62 878
. K+ P |/ a/ M5 R: K9 ]. I
' w2 S: j+ ^, [8 m2 I3 m5 q4 X: V* EUniversity of Delaware
( `6 J7 v2 e( L6 R# J0 p7 L& ]42 43 2.9 3.5 749 26.3% 4.5 3.2% $35.1 $369.5 61 708 3 L3 o% I% c8 N( `$ p& ^
$ j: q& O9 [2 ~7 W0 A- [ xArizona State University (Fulton)
! ]" t7 G @. y6 X. e- k' Y& Z47 42 3.3 3.4 751 45.2% 3.1 3.2% $44.9 $245.5 63 1,498 3 V" J v* `. y% j6 I$ |5 R
- F4 H4 H) {: X, FLehigh University (Rossin) (PA)
2 r$ I% [9 y& t: B, R# r0 k# q; [47 42 3.1 3.5 766 31.6% 2.8 7.5% $31.3 $256.7 53 576
) l& D [ ?) {3 P6 z! O* J/ p
( Y. I9 L! p8 [; ^3 Q6 \7 R# JRutgers State University–New Brunswick (NJ)
, j/ }% P Y+ m5 ~47 42 3.1 3.2 745 23.5% 1.5 3.9% $82.7 $397.8 51 890 " o7 N# I+ q( F- ]# j# i
& s; T J+ p; X- a' b! [3 j7 Q% FVanderbilt University (TN) * x9 b7 @- o3 e
47 42 3.2 3.4 757 13.5% 3.6 1.2% $33.7 $400.9 23 386
' ]0 F3 w+ \6 p$ o+ G
" Z; Z+ G# ]) V4 ] z; X! B) wBrown University (RI) + \+ l2 @4 R( T
51 39 3.3 3.6 N/A 27.1% 3.1 6.8% $15.7 $271.5 19 252
1 T6 N3 V1 t/ T% K
$ z# c: [+ r9 `1 e3 [6 B/ i; G6 P, P/ ~Michigan State University
4 h# m7 |" L$ d* A+ V) K52 38 3.2 3.4 756 17.4% 2.5 0.0% $24.2 $163.7 55 558
- s8 Z8 G) t5 Z; j3 v( E
/ e* x* E5 T; S5 c( `University of Arizona
* v% t; \0 \* X- s+ L$ P52 38 3.3 3.3 747 48.1% 2.7 3.1% $26.9 $171.4 60 716
, J9 A+ i5 r/ |3 m" [. S- M2 E9 R3 |$ w9 M
University at Buffalo–SUNY 8 R3 i A, I) U/ _- R( ~) E: a0 u
54 37 2.9 3.1 757 46.6% 2.7 0.9% $37.7 $330.9 63 922
4 o8 {0 j, V) L$ [ L3 n$ k; l; r" m; r' P1 i
University of Massachusetts–Amherst
, R( N6 l9 _8 `* N# e! ~3 H, ]4 ~" d* s54 37 3.0 3.3 740 24.8% 3.0 0.0% $39.3 $286.5 46 695 6 E ~( s; a: e6 a
! J1 A, D* S& t ~2 |University of Notre Dame (IN)
& ?* @4 I5 T3 D1 Z54 37 3.2 3.3 758 28.0% 3.6 1.0% $17.7 $175.2 38 424 5 D2 ^( L( R; s* Z
6 z+ v8 v' u TUniversity of Pittsburgh ; e0 ]- V7 D: y+ ]2 `
54 37 3.0 3.1 739 34.5% 2.5 1.6% $46.1 $387.2 46 621
3 `0 a9 M% W" r2 P6 }1 S+ h. ]7 S$ V9 S5 s8 E4 g0 C! a4 A) e$ m: T
University of Illinois–Chicago
: u+ {$ [1 ?; O8 ^( `58 35 2.9 3.2 756 28.0% 3.1 1.8% $23.0 $214.5 41 898
: A: m3 {9 {* {0 A4 s# @+ f. \6 ^. K* }& I9 O5 t- K0 O
University of Iowa 1 f" V* w" }/ Z! L9 S" X2 I* _) D; X
58 35 2.9 3.2 728 30.7% 3.4 1.1% $26.7 $287.1 38 477
2 {" v# o) D2 y& t
7 X9 t; ^$ J" K3 e3 f& @University of Utah
, o( A- n0 ], \58 35 2.8 3.2 746 40.3% 2.1 3.5% $41.8 $359.9 48 738
4 [% c4 U+ j$ X8 j, _7 x! A- |" M/ l' n1 z
Colorado State University
# O* [8 Z1 A E$ |# B) o4 j61 34 2.8 3.1 726 40.9% 0.9 1.1% $50.4 $508.8 33 546
/ `. ]. p# l3 \" g3 f6 F/ g: U7 D4 m2 \) ~$ M$ H
Drexel University (PA) 7 w* _+ H$ s8 D% A1 u; J# s5 O% L1 X
61 34 2.9 3.3 736 60.4% 2.3 3.3% $33.7 $275.9 40 873
" w7 H+ k/ E. Q$ m. d T# _1 J9 d7 ~: C" q3 Q2 r3 l
SUNY–Stony Brook " c. R4 V% O: |" B5 E4 K
63 33 2.9 3.1 744 45.5% 2.3 2.6% $25.7 $219.7 53 876
( i& `+ U. @7 }6 v4 ?# `$ I5 A
+ m# m2 k# N0 T K: Q' _. UUniversity of California–Riverside (Bourns) ' f# B; h2 ?8 ~' l& D
63 33 2.5 3.0 757 32.1% 3.3 1.4% $33.5 $484.9 26 323 4 l' i V1 X) z/ a3 n
% ]0 h- b" x0 L: f
University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill
$ R( m# ?. A' | X63 33 3.1 3.5 709 48.9% 2.2 2.9% $10.6 $279.0 6 141
/ ?/ {/ A9 M; y9 ? Y6 c+ Z
2 d1 l% ]$ F* T0 }: oUniversity of Connecticut
. R6 n( n/ Z, _66 32 2.7 3.1 749 29.3% 2.5 1.0% $24.9 $239.0 42 537 C, R* s# O8 I& i5 ~& t7 g( w
6 c9 A/ G& P0 A& G& H( J+ Q2 r1 sUniversity of New Orleans A + t" v0 N, j* @9 ~: w4 m8 D2 Z8 X
66 32 1.8 2.0 N/A 34.7% 1.5 74.3% $10.1 $288.6 11 242
3 H* K( m% x% a, B1 Z8 o' R( [4 T. @# D/ x% r
Clemson University (SC) * W5 Y+ l P1 f' d: H+ L4 R
68 31 2.9 3.4 724 47.5% 1.3 0.0% $26.7 $163.8 42 763
6 D5 [) {( I" b# V# V
3 E# T' r3 A% W1 T8 ^! E' nNortheastern University (MA)
; n7 k" Z0 V( o0 S. N; {) I68 31 2.8 3.2 746 54.0% 2.3 0.0% $24.9 $295.9 21 771
% l2 G, p: ~+ g$ P$ W8 I4 g! e0 Y+ K
% J: l* m# d6 L% C$ vUniversity of Missouri–Rolla
2 }6 G$ A8 U6 V68 31 3.0 3.4 725 53.4% 1.3 0.5% $26.9 $148.7 56 1,041
$ q8 g! G' E3 g: D0 L! S" ]' {% w- S
Colorado School of Mines % {+ q" Z# a) r1 E
71 30 2.9 3.5 691 62.6% 1.4 1.8% $26.6 $174.1 51 744 $ T: `3 Y, e: J8 d) j* c' c- u/ w
- K! k# G* [+ p! P
Syracuse University (NY) * r" g& e4 M+ b4 ?) {
71 30 2.7 3.2 N/A 56.3% 2.9 1.6% $14.9 $229.3 29 845
& X8 d1 f) ~ u% S( P; i3 o" I) A
University of Tennessee–Knoxville $ D" Y' J& t/ a1 m$ M3 K
71 30 2.8 3.3 718 58.5% 1.1 2.5% $36.3 $231.0 37 873
' f/ W5 z/ h& d6 c# c/ N
" ^/ \3 {/ q/ B3 ]* TAuburn University (Ginn) (AL)
' b' k3 i; j1 i+ ^: ?. G& U4 R& f74 29 2.8 3.4 711 56.0% 1.0 0.0% $34.5 $218.4 33 670 ) o% i% W: A# @4 z
4 c( W3 H/ M9 K
Illinois Institute of Technology (Armour) " e6 b1 ]7 O9 W) y
74 29 2.7 3.2 719 55.1% 1.3 2.2% $19.2 $208.6 35 960
[4 I0 k1 Q" ~) c& S4 Z) E i! x' y C2 \
University of Cincinnati 2 U: d# [. j9 m6 w; A# h
74 29 2.7 3.0 745 37.7% 2.5 0.0% $21.1 $144.8 55 1,039 $ I9 O, d: i7 _% ?, }2 `
K) S1 o. S4 k0 w. J! v( f2 `Polytechnic University (NY)
# i7 e+ F2 C9 S F9 E, {77 28 2.7 3.3 N/A 68.4% 1.4 5.4% $12.6 $196.7 20 913
2 }, q4 ]7 O: k6 S/ W: T4 f4 s0 w& D- w
University of Houston (Cullen)
/ g ^! Q3 L5 z77 28 2.6 3.0 752 53.9% 2.1 4.6% $14.2 $152.5 42 822 + v$ g' N. z5 l" h, l! c) x
5 |. [# j1 Q1 |0 m$ y; K/ g2 jUniversity of New Mexico , r6 e) A, F1 r1 k, f' B
77 28 2.6 2.9 705 49.0% 2.7 2.2% $26.6 $276.7 43 622
) K2 N% P1 o# r! y
7 s. G' q ^- V8 L6 z t7 qWashington State University 3 m; I m( u: j
77 28 2.8 3.1 728 26.0% 1.7 1.1% $18.1 $153.6 30 441 $ K& X$ m! L2 z: r" T0 u# {( ]
4 E4 K% m2 d/ [0 O' l, `
University of Central Florida
# K( C! r6 k8 I, G81 27 2.4 2.6 715 44.4% 3.0 0.0% $55.1 $344.2 48 1,071 2 E( m3 U3 B6 H9 L, ]$ j7 Y
* J: e* Y6 W+ ?" C4 QMichigan Technological University
+ x% J# t0 ?2 B) a) p" S8 x4 C82 26 2.7 3.3 717 55.6% 1.6 0.0% $16.1 $123.1 30 494
0 a- I# |: [9 [+ Y& Y( |. K( M* M g
Mississippi State University (Bagley)
2 L# P d. r8 E# `5 [82 26 2.3 2.8 724 31.6% 1.3 0.0% $40.8 $377.4 14 461
4 ^% T% B) u' ~- X1 m. z5 e% f* Q) [- |9 z V( k! E; H
Tulane University (LA)A
. ^4 |1 C. }- }' ~82 26 2.7 3.2 718 30.6% 2.3 0.0% $6.8 $126.4 19 183 * v2 [! p$ ^4 s6 ]
! ~& A1 Z: r. g* c8 m1 HUniversity of Kentucky 5 e4 a- D% v0 l
82 26 2.5 2.9 751 50.4% 1.6 0.0% $27.9 $186.1 36 640
* C5 X" `$ _2 k
+ u6 y1 N4 c/ A6 B% B* T/ sNew Jersey Institute of Technology
9 e6 e! j$ B5 M6 \ E# G& |86 25 2.6 2.8 713 52.9% 1.4 0.0% $28.7 $222.5 41 1,116
9 q% n2 y. t) d6 K, u4 G' e6 f2 S% m! T+ v7 E& z0 y7 R
Oregon State University # K& E/ R% x$ M, |+ m
86 25 2.7 2.8 740 50.4% 1.5 0.0% $22.8 $201.6 25 508 1 B8 w. [8 C( R: v! R3 A" j
/ Y: h# A2 T( d: p
Tufts University (MA) + t7 ^- W' ]' ?7 D4 m
86 25 2.7 3.1 702 47.8% 2.1 1.7% $8.0 $142.3 8 491
( o Y! }% j* l5 v) U0 n% ?# [1 K
, [8 G( P% r" c1 ELouisiana State University–Baton Rouge 2 G# A/ W; [/ B/ l6 i; y
89 24 2.6 2.8 728 35.4% 2.2 0.0% $15.6 $107.5 28 633
# m. t$ ?9 [, M% y
2 _, }. t4 }; u; k5 n- xUniversity of Oklahoma 2 j) g1 O+ a1 N2 W
89 24 2.6 3.0 732 57.2% 1.4 0.0% $16.0 $140.6 24 557
* X b! O/ `3 ~6 C5 R8 d" d: @: f: c8 ~1 h; J" Q: V5 t9 g
University of Texas–Dallas
1 ~9 o8 e( _) _ P89 24 2.4 2.6 754 50.0% 2.1 3.5% $19.0 $237.5 34 981
( Z, r$ v: B4 A/ x! C/ l) k; `: f; a! L; z Y+ J4 f9 x
West Virginia University - S: j. Q& @: m2 ^
89 24 2.5 2.8 728 48.9% 1.3 0.0% $23.8 $251.0 28 721 5 s7 G2 \; F0 ^4 m/ Q# T/ h
6 E5 p5 W- {% I9 ^# ^) uTexas Tech University ; U3 p5 d+ R2 a4 \+ r
93 23 2.5 3.1 716 46.6% 1.5 0.9% $11.9 $92.7 31 558 % ]$ R$ ]2 R+ W$ f: X* B
" t8 a0 A& i, d! S1 g8 G& B
University of Missouri–Columbia
: u8 s- F5 e3 J S1 }93 23 2.5 3.1 770 72.9% 0.8 0.0% $11.3 $105.2 20 408
, t. x! I; R _# R C( j7 x, ?2 D: C2 \$ `5 y) q" E, @
Worcester Polytechnic Institute (MA) 4 ]7 L& V( a8 C# L+ L" d
93 23 2.6 3.1 743 68.6% 1.3 0.0% $9.6 $95.6 15 555
