帮忙改改红delta上test5的综合作文
6 R" ]( T2 o8 |1 _    In the reading passage, the writer states that intelligence testing is accurate and effective. However, the speaker casts doubts on his statement by citing a recent research. : Q* o4 u3 J. |. P' ]
& x! x) g' u$ X5 g' d9 ^  x: Q$ r0 r" ^
First of all, not as the writer puts it, the lecturer points out that many psychologists think that the intelligence testing is limited and can't predict one's life or achievement accurately. This is the first point that the speaker disagrees with the writer.; B8 K" G# _% V8 K: G" p
8 X/ O. N3 z' |+ T
Although the writer argues that IQ tests are can be used to predict children's success in school, the lecturer holds an opposing point. Study has showed that some children with high scores in IQ tests didn't have any apparent professional or academic success in their school lives, and performance of some of them is not promising. This is an outcome that is quite the opposite to the author's expectation. 7 J8 w; r, S0 m  G
1 t/ r2 M4 \+ ~0 C" j! I# E* |
Finally, the professor of the lecture states that IQ is not a proper measurement of general intelligence as the writer says. IQ may be useful for testing the ability in schoolhouse, but its effect is still not reliable. For recent 30 years, experts have come up with a better definition to value one's intelligence, and it includes motivation and creation. Because a person who is creative is full of energy and able to solve problems, using various solutions, it proves that this new method works. This is another disagreement between speaker and writer. + F8 x8 j* _* ~# e5 K- |/ H7 T

1 y2 T& t8 O  L: tIn conclusion, the speaker doesn't believe that the results of IQ tests are dependable. Instead, creation is a comparatively accurate indicator of one's intelligence.

嗯，delta有第5套题？噢，是不是那本红色的书？呵呵～

是那本红色的书